NASA Science Censor Resigns
It’s official. George Deutsch, the Bush appointee and science censor at NASA who lied about graduating from Texas A&M University, has resigned thanks to the efforts of a little website that some of you may have heard of. Andrew Revkin of The New York Times reports:
(emphasis added)
When I originally posted my discoveries on Deutsch, I did not have access to his resume, so I only mentioned that he “may have intentionally misled” people. After being informed that he explicitly stated that he obtained a B.A. in Journalism from A&M in 2003, though, I can now say that he lied directly and intentionally. Although he would not have been qualified to be in his position even if he did have a degree, it is fortunate that this has come to light because it forced him to resign. Although the problem of political interference in science runs much deeper, this is a necessary first step toward addressing it.
NASA scientist James Hansen makes an interesting point about the coverage of Deutsch’s lack of a college degree:
Hansen is really on to something here, and instead of the story being about a 24-year-old lying, it should be about this: how did this guy, who already had dubious qualifications, make it into NASA with such an obvious lie on his resume? To work for a federal agency, including NASA, extensive background checks are usually required. If I was able to uncover the truth about Deutsch in one phone call, then he must have been placed in his current position without any investigation, due to his loyal service on the Bush presidential campaign.
For a president that paints himself as a champion of national security, the NASA incident is a major blow to Bush’s credibility. This isn’t the first time either, with George Deutsch now joining the ranks of Michael Brown, the embattled former director of FEMA, and Harriet Myers, Bush’s Supreme Court nominee who was subsequently withdrawn. Congratulations, Deutsch, this is a pretty elite circle!
The NASA censorship scandal was originally about partisan figures compromising the science, and it still is, but now it’s also about something much deeper and much more troubling. I don’t know how many others there are out there like Deutsch, but it shouldn’t be hard to find out. Journalists, it’s time to make some phone calls!
In the meantime, NASA needs the authority to remove the rest of those who are interfering with the scientific process for partisan gains. Although NASA's credibility has tragically taken a big hit here due to political interference, the real victim is the science. And, when the science suffers, we are all affected.
Mr. Deutsch's educational record was first challenged on Monday by Nick Anthis, who graduated from Texas A&M last year with a biochemistry degree and has been writing a Web log on science policy, scientificactivist.blogspot.com.
After Mr. Anthis read about the problems at NASA, he said in an interview: "It seemed like political figures had really overstepped the line. I was just going to write some commentary on this when somebody tipped me off that George Deutsch might not have graduated."
He posted a blog entry asserting this after he checked with the university's association of former students. He reported that the association said Mr. Deutsch received no degree.
A copy of Mr. Deutsch's résumé was provided to The Times by someone working in NASA headquarters who, along with many other NASA employees, said Mr. Deutsch played a small but significant role in an intensifying effort at the agency to exert political control over the flow of information to the public.
Such complaints came to the fore starting in late January, when James E. Hansen, the climate scientist, and several midlevel public affairs officers told The Times that political appointees, including Mr. Deutsch, were pressing to limit Dr. Hansen's speaking and interviews on the threats posed by global warming.
(emphasis added)
When I originally posted my discoveries on Deutsch, I did not have access to his resume, so I only mentioned that he “may have intentionally misled” people. After being informed that he explicitly stated that he obtained a B.A. in Journalism from A&M in 2003, though, I can now say that he lied directly and intentionally. Although he would not have been qualified to be in his position even if he did have a degree, it is fortunate that this has come to light because it forced him to resign. Although the problem of political interference in science runs much deeper, this is a necessary first step toward addressing it.
NASA scientist James Hansen makes an interesting point about the coverage of Deutsch’s lack of a college degree:
Yesterday, Dr. Hansen said that the questions about Mr. Deutsch's credentials were important, but were a distraction from the broader issue of political control of scientific information.
"He's only a bit player," Dr. Hansen said of Mr. Deutsch. " The problem is much broader and much deeper and it goes across agencies. That's what I'm really concerned about."
"On climate, the public has been misinformed and not informed," he said. "The foundation of a democracy is an informed public, which obviously means an honestly informed public. That's the big issue here."
Hansen is really on to something here, and instead of the story being about a 24-year-old lying, it should be about this: how did this guy, who already had dubious qualifications, make it into NASA with such an obvious lie on his resume? To work for a federal agency, including NASA, extensive background checks are usually required. If I was able to uncover the truth about Deutsch in one phone call, then he must have been placed in his current position without any investigation, due to his loyal service on the Bush presidential campaign.
For a president that paints himself as a champion of national security, the NASA incident is a major blow to Bush’s credibility. This isn’t the first time either, with George Deutsch now joining the ranks of Michael Brown, the embattled former director of FEMA, and Harriet Myers, Bush’s Supreme Court nominee who was subsequently withdrawn. Congratulations, Deutsch, this is a pretty elite circle!
The NASA censorship scandal was originally about partisan figures compromising the science, and it still is, but now it’s also about something much deeper and much more troubling. I don’t know how many others there are out there like Deutsch, but it shouldn’t be hard to find out. Journalists, it’s time to make some phone calls!
In the meantime, NASA needs the authority to remove the rest of those who are interfering with the scientific process for partisan gains. Although NASA's credibility has tragically taken a big hit here due to political interference, the real victim is the science. And, when the science suffers, we are all affected.
204 Comments:
Nice work! :)
By
LQ, at Wed Feb 08, 12:05:00 PM
NOAA has had the same problems. Politics (and political apointees) should never be involved in science.
By
Anonymous, at Wed Feb 08, 12:20:00 PM
let me me the (second) blogger to congratulate you. As a scientist (and fellow biochemist) I am increasingly worried about the politicisation of science by the Bush administration. Even though I am in Australia, its influence is felt even here. Thank you for landing one back for us!
By
The Other Guy, at Wed Feb 08, 12:20:00 PM
Keep up the good work--you're doing a service to all Americans.
Best,
cwhig
By
Cwhig, at Wed Feb 08, 12:23:00 PM
Hooray for genuine research!!!!
By
Anonymous, at Wed Feb 08, 12:30:00 PM
Nice work.
By
Scott Ross, at Wed Feb 08, 12:36:00 PM
Quality activism there Nick!!!
Encore please. Think climate change.
By
Anonymous, at Wed Feb 08, 01:00:00 PM
Thanks for the excellent investigative work! For the problem at NASA to be fixed we're gonna have to start with a regime change at home.
GirlScientist (whose blog is up and coming)
By
Anonymous, at Wed Feb 08, 01:14:00 PM
You're my hero.
By
Professor Foland, at Wed Feb 08, 01:28:00 PM
It's getting harder for the American conservatives to hoodwink the peons, thanks to the internet and concerned bloggers like you.
However, it appears the next logical step for Bush and his wingnuts will be to edit and cleanse the internet. Hopefully we are too big and powerful for that to happen.
By
Anonymous, at Wed Feb 08, 01:29:00 PM
George W. sure has a penchant for cronyism, doesn't he? How anyone can take this sham of a president seriously, is beyond me. We've repressed ourselves with his campaigns of fear, uncertainty and doubt, and continue to tolerate it in the name of "patriotism" or "national security".
Good job on this Nick. It's what fellow bloggers love about the blog community as a whole. The free exchange of relevant and truthful information.....
By
Greg, at Wed Feb 08, 01:34:00 PM
Congratulations. This is exactly the kind of thing that needs to be exposed, particularly in an Agency whose mission I believe in and used to work for. I think this situation is but one example of the broader issue of politics contaminating Agencies that should be apolitical.
By
Jagosaurus, at Wed Feb 08, 01:42:00 PM
I have a feeling you're going to have an explosion of hits at this point but as one of the people directed here by the Times link, I just wanted to say: hats off to you. It has a wonderful kind of David/Goliath feel that a blogger was able to undo some of the arrogant, dangerous, anti-intellectual work of this administration.
By
Anonymous, at Wed Feb 08, 01:42:00 PM
Yet another instance of a Bush appointee who simply wasn't qualified or deserving of his post. Much like Bush himself. I don't know how anyone could work at a place like NASA and have such a whopper of a lie on their resume. Beyond arrogance. Thanks to those who have the nerve to bring this information into the light of day!
By
Anonymous, at Wed Feb 08, 01:44:00 PM
It's amazing someone like this still managed to get in the door like he did. I went through extensive background checks to get into a hospital administrative job; why doesn't NASA at least have half as much of a check as that.
www.xanga.com/little_sarbonn
By
Duane, at Wed Feb 08, 01:50:00 PM
awesome work, need more activist like you
By
D. Phillips, at Wed Feb 08, 01:51:00 PM
I hate to say this but by exposing Mr.Deutsch, you not only weakened our national security but you are encouraging our enemy. This at a time when our nation is at war. A war on terror. If you are not with us, then you must definitely be with the enemy. I am sure you were not created by god himself but followed the path of evolution.
-The unsung republican(I used to be a janitor in the war-room in 2004 campaign. Pretty soon, I hope to land a federal job :) )
By
Anonymous, at Wed Feb 08, 01:55:00 PM
Godd work, Nick. Science is truth.
By
Anonymous, at Wed Feb 08, 02:00:00 PM
Just perfect! Today is a tiny bit less unpleasant now. Many thanks.
By
Anonymous, at Wed Feb 08, 02:01:00 PM
What a great post. The analysis of the situation is spot on. This is about more than some Bush flunky lying his way into a cushy job. For gawd's sake, it was NASA!
Congratulations and thanks for your work on this. It's amazing how bloggers are getting out information that "real journalists" miss. Thankfully their hubris was not so great as to neglect to print your follow-up.
i got here via Americablog so HT to John Aravosis. And if I ever get to Great Britain (which is my dream vacation) I'd love to shake your hand.
By
mpower1952, at Wed Feb 08, 02:05:00 PM
Great work Nick. I've been following this story since it popped up on Digg a few days ago. As an Aggie who now works on NASA contracts, this story was deeply troubling to me. Thank you all your work in solving this problem.
Brad T.
Class of '04
By
Anonymous, at Wed Feb 08, 02:18:00 PM
Anyone seen Laurie Anderson's End of the Moon performance? She gives lots of insight into the workings of NASA from her perspective as NASA's first (and last)artist in residence. Of particular interest is NASA's development of a spacesuit that was turned over to the military. From news accounts, it doesn't sound as if the troops in the field have the benefit of this technology.
By
Anonymous, at Wed Feb 08, 02:19:00 PM
bravo. keep up the good work.
By
Anonymous, at Wed Feb 08, 02:19:00 PM
Way to go on reporting this, Nick. You've done everyone a great service. Let's keep pressure on the issue of honesty, accuracy, and accountability in public relations.
By
michael, at Wed Feb 08, 02:21:00 PM
I work for my state. I've seen plenty of examples of people landing in jobs ("political refugees", for example), basically due to their connections. Have yet to find any who lied on resumes or did any harm, though. And we're not talking about science or emergency management or national security, fortunately.
People are human. These things are going to happen, and to a certain degree, it isn't harmful. But this is way outta hand now.
Excellent work. Have one on me!
By
Jeff, at Wed Feb 08, 02:40:00 PM
Nick, thanks for the legwork you did on this. I find the whole thing hard to believe. I work as a subcontractor to NASA...now I'm wondering just how deep the rot goes.
By
Remus Shepherd, at Wed Feb 08, 02:40:00 PM
how did this guy, who already had dubious qualifications, make it into NASA with such an obvious lie on his resume?
It probably happens alot more than we think it does. Also, he didn't need an extensive background check because he has already proved he was a Bush loyalist. That apparently is sufficient.
You did a great job on this though.
By
PCS, at Wed Feb 08, 02:46:00 PM
What a timely site. Thanks. I also appreciate the courage of Professor Hansen in talking about the current atmosphere and political pressures within the research universities.This appointee is only a bit player. Keep pulling the thread and a picture will emerge of the direct connection between US forgeign policy, the CIA, and foundations, in univeristy research in technology, social sciences, planning, and even art. This partnership has existed since at least WW2, and even survived the protests of the late 1960's. Take a look at Associated Universities, and CIS at MIT.
By
Anonymous, at Wed Feb 08, 02:47:00 PM
If a terrorist wanted to have easy access to federal buildings, all he'd need to do is pretend to be a loyal bush campaigner for a while, and get a no-questions-asked job.
By
Jim, at Wed Feb 08, 02:53:00 PM
Nice work, Nick. May all science-deniers end up unemployed like Mr. Deutsch.
But I do have one minor quibble. You wrote: "To work for a federal agency, including NASA, extensive background checks are usually required." This is true for people who are hired via the usual federal processes, but is not necessarily required for presidential appointees. The president is granted a lot of discretion in his appointments. Presidents have, by long tradition, abused this discretion by appointing friends and political donors to cushy federal jobs - say, appointing someone to be ambassador to a minor country, even if the person does not speak the local language and knows nothing of the country.
Presidents of both parties have been guilty here, and I am not sure that President Bush is much worse than others have been. What makes Bush unique is his particular war against science. Kudos to you again, Nick, for striking a blow for science!
By
Anonymous, at Wed Feb 08, 02:56:00 PM
Great post. Keep up the good work :) I'll be checking back often.
By
StormChickX, at Wed Feb 08, 02:58:00 PM
Bravo! You should be awfully proud of this work.
By
Dr. Tom More, at Wed Feb 08, 03:01:00 PM
Good work! (Maybe you've figured out what "scientific activism" means after all!)
By
blog responder, at Wed Feb 08, 03:02:00 PM
I've just stubled over this:
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled."
(Richard P. Feynman)
By
DaPi, at Wed Feb 08, 03:16:00 PM
Grea job. I don't see this as scientific activism as much as basic fact-checking. Of course I'm baised because I think science-minded folks are much better at seeing the facts through the BS.
I agree with Mr. Anthis that this seems to be a very disturbing pattern, and I just have to wonder why reporters haven't spent more time covering the issue of partisan patronage in the Bush Administration. Wasn't FEMA's Brown a big enough hint? How widespread is this? Wasn't that a big issue in Iraq--young, green, unqualified political operatives were sent in instead of adults who knew something about the region?
Thanks for a great blog!
By
vaughan, at Wed Feb 08, 03:18:00 PM
Holy Crap! Not only have you made me a believer in blogs being more than pointless human opinion, but that people really can make a difference; a cliche I know, but we need reinforcing every now and again. Seriously dude, good work. Journalism of the past is dead, it's now up to us to do the real digging and get the real dirt.
By
Anonymous, at Wed Feb 08, 03:21:00 PM
It is a courageous thing that you have done to bring this information forward into public view.
Those who hold political office need to be held accountable to the public for their actions. It is encouraging to see people step forward to voice their concerns when a government's agenda runs counter to the best interests of its citizens and those of the world at large.
Our political leaders will only change their political ideals if the indignation of the masses is significant enough to catch their attention.
Congratulations to you for your moral integrity and your effective use of weblogs to promote public awareness; and congratulations to the mainstream media for helping to bring your weblog to our attention!
By
Lorenzo Z Oznerol, at Wed Feb 08, 03:26:00 PM
Very interesting. I found this news and blog from http://www.megite.com/index.php?section=technology&date=1139409592&start=1#item_14
By
Anonymous, at Wed Feb 08, 03:28:00 PM
Thanks Nick Anthis!
Anthony Guzzi
By
Anonymous, at Wed Feb 08, 03:31:00 PM
Hey Nickeroo! You rock! Good double-super-secret-science-sleuthing!
Americablog & C&L linked to you (and World O'Crap too?) so now you have the joy (and burden) of being tucked into our Favorite links and forever being our science watchdog!
Sure hope you do that NASA FOIA and see what George's SES position & pay was.
And maybe inquire about all of NASA's (and maybe NOAA's) Bush&Co political appointees, their pay, and qualifications.
Well done!
By
Anonymous, at Wed Feb 08, 03:33:00 PM
Congratulations on a superb job. You're future is bright and we should all pay attention!
By
zenrain, at Wed Feb 08, 03:34:00 PM
your awesome, thanks
By
Frankie, at Wed Feb 08, 03:35:00 PM
Makes me feel just a little better knowing that there are bloggers out there acting as a last line of defense against an administration run amok. THANKS SO MUCH!
By
Anonymous, at Wed Feb 08, 03:42:00 PM
Thank you, Nick Anthis.
What's also curious in all this is why a PR guy has anything whatever to do with correcting the writing of scientists. Nevermind Deutsch. The larger issue is still there, and there is no state, local, or national bureacracy which was not facing politicization before Bush came to power. It's just in the nature of bureacracy to lose sight of the work at hand.
But Bush and the neocons have exploited this natural tendency to the extreme, so it was all the more inevitable that they should come in conflict with the reality that politics are not the wisest mode for dealing with the basic exploration of reality.
And again, thanks to you Mr. Anthis for bringing the issue into the public light, again. And for embarrassing the pack of tyrrants hard at work in the U.S. who simply must be made to go away.
By
Bit NOLA, at Wed Feb 08, 03:48:00 PM
Good Job, Nice to see the truth win out.
By
Anonymous, at Wed Feb 08, 03:55:00 PM
Outstanding job. You should be proud of what you did. You pointed out a wrong, and someone noticed resulting in the appropriate action.
Good work!
By
AH, at Wed Feb 08, 03:57:00 PM
Very good job, indeed.
It is likely that NASA's science problems won't resolve themselves until Micheal "Death Star" Griffin is gone, too.
He's already butchering science for Star Wars- related shuttle use.
By
kelley b., at Wed Feb 08, 03:57:00 PM
Time to add a new blog to my bookmarks, good job Nick!
By
Anonymous, at Wed Feb 08, 03:57:00 PM
Nick Anthis, thanks so much for your work. These are such alarming times to be living in (in terms of the lengths this administration et al. will go to in order to conceal vital info), that it's incredibly encouraging to know that there are still folks out there willing to fight against the current tyrrany of mendacity.
By
Anonymous, at Wed Feb 08, 04:00:00 PM
Excellent work!
By
zulu, at Wed Feb 08, 04:05:00 PM
Thank you Nick.
Alex Alaniz, Ph.D.
Los Alamos, NM 87544
By
AA, at Wed Feb 08, 04:05:00 PM
Nick, you said, "If I was able to uncover the truth about Deutsch in one phone call, then he must have been placed in his current position without any investigation, due to his loyal service on the Bush presidential campaign."
While it seems in character for the "activist" part of your blog, this line of reasoning does not seem particularly "scientific." The conclusion that his placement and lack of thorough background check resulted from his conservative loyalties does not follow and is not at all clear.
I'm not saying it isn't the case, but if one is going to be an activist, presumably (in part) for scientific credibility, one would benefit from avoiding assumptions, no?
By
Bike Lane, at Wed Feb 08, 04:08:00 PM
Mr. Anthis --
Don't you know that when you expose a bush administration hack, God kills a puppy?
Seriously, it's just the latest example of how loyalty and not competence or honesty matters to this administration. the process that let this goober into NASA public affairs is the same one that allowed a gay prostitute with an alias daily access to the white house press briefing room without actually being a journalist.
By
Anonymous, at Wed Feb 08, 04:09:00 PM
Great job, Nick! Now if we could get some real reform in government and solidify that whole church/state separation which keeps leaking in...
By
Chris, at Wed Feb 08, 04:11:00 PM
Hear Hear!
By
Anonymous, at Wed Feb 08, 04:29:00 PM
YOU ARE AWESOME! Thank you so much for your research!
By
Anonymous, at Wed Feb 08, 04:33:00 PM
"Congratulations, Deutsch, this is a pretty elite circle!"
and at 24 years old! wow! where can i sign up to help on a presidential campaign?
By
Anonymous, at Wed Feb 08, 04:39:00 PM
I am so glad that 99 percent of the comments are ones of congratulations because you have really done a great service to our country!! The one percent of the comments saying in essence that you are helping the enemy, etc are so off base and transparent that I have to laugh at the horrendous ignorance that exists in the ultra neo conservative right these days.
By
Anonymous, at Wed Feb 08, 04:47:00 PM
Generally I support what you've done.
BUT: Neither Deutsch's age nor lack of degree should be at issue here, nor should his political connections have affected things. I had considerably more responsibility in a Senate office at not much older than he is. The issue is unethical behavior, by journalism standards (see the the ethics rules of the Society of Professional Journalists, for example -- if he was any good, he should already have been a member), and under federal rules. I believe a check would reveal that NASA is bound by law not to monkey with science results. That law applies to everyone in the agency, I believe, not just the researchers. NASA's inspector general should be invited to investigate. And, when I was a political appointee directing the release of public information about federally-financed research, everyone fully understood that it was against regulations and the law to attempt to skew the research results after the fact.
Consider how many other agencies could be involved in similar situations: HHS, FDA, NIH, NOAA, EPA, Labor, Interior, Agriculture, Defense, Education . . . how many more Deutsch's are there out there?
Find the problems, make sure the policies are clear, enforce the rules.
By
Ed Darrell, at Wed Feb 08, 04:48:00 PM
Great work, Nick. Aren't we all lucky that a science policy blogger happened to have graduated from A&M and have sharp eyes!
By
Anonymous, at Wed Feb 08, 04:50:00 PM
Yer doin a heck of a job George! (Both of ya!)
Truth.. uh... truth and... um ah... lemmie see... can't get fooled again...
By
Doogman, at Wed Feb 08, 04:51:00 PM
What ARE the penalties for lying in this instance? I'd think they're pretty draconian. (or ought to be)
By
Doogman, at Wed Feb 08, 04:52:00 PM
Thanks, Nick. Well done.
By
Anonymous, at Wed Feb 08, 04:53:00 PM
michael said...
For a president that paints himself as a champion of national security, the NASA incident is a major blow to Bush’s credibility.
Well, Bush has had numerous blows to his credibility
-----
Yep, he just 'blows' generally.
By
Doogman, at Wed Feb 08, 04:53:00 PM
Congrats Nick. Way to go!
By the way, how does it feel to be blog-famous?!
By
Morgan W. Brown, at Wed Feb 08, 04:54:00 PM
michael said...
Actually I think this is a minor hit on their credibility, after all it's clear it wasn't NASA's idea to hire this political correctness minder. A much bigger hit to NASA's credibility is the sad state of the space shuttle program.
------
Mr. Proxmire, line 1. Astronaut famlies, lines 2-11, holding.
By
Doogman, at Wed Feb 08, 04:55:00 PM
For a president that paints himself as a champion of national security, the NASA incident is a major blow to Bush’s credibility.
Well, Bush has had numerous blows to his credibility (Plame leak... 8/6/01 PDB titled, "Bin Laden Determined To Strike Inside US"... no WMDs... "Mission Accomplished"... etc,etc) but some 40% of those polled still support him.
Although NASA's credibility has tragically taken a big hit here due to political interference
Actually I think this is a minor hit on their credibility, after all it's clear it wasn't NASA's idea to hire this political correctness minder. A much bigger hit to NASA's credibility is the sad state of the space shuttle program.
Kudos to you, Nick. Once again, bloggers do the work that reporters should be doing.
By
michael, at Wed Feb 08, 04:56:00 PM
M
the moron
By
Anonymous, at Wed Feb 08, 04:58:00 PM
Great work, hopefully this type of sabotage, perversion and duplicity has reached a point where men and women in the scientific communties realize that we need them to speak up as often as possible as their concerns and perceptions are not being adequetly discussed in public forums.
By
J Nichols, at Wed Feb 08, 05:01:00 PM
Congratulations, and thanks for all you do.
By
Maezeppa, at Wed Feb 08, 05:03:00 PM
way to go, dude. Another shill bites the dust.
By
Anonymous, at Wed Feb 08, 05:05:00 PM
Great work Nick. PR folks have no rules except sell it. He was an installed party shill, and not the first. The Interior Secretary altered reports on caribou calving in ANWR. It's a trend with this bunch who have no respect for the truth, only to the agenda.
By
Mark, at Wed Feb 08, 05:08:00 PM
Nice work Mr. Anthis.
By
Anonymous, at Wed Feb 08, 05:10:00 PM
Good work, Nick! I salute you! Great sleuthing! How does it feel to expose a President and actually see results?
By
George, at Wed Feb 08, 05:10:00 PM
Congrats Nick! You're now a famous blogger. It feels cool to actually know someone with their name in the NYT. :) Have a great day, and bask in your glory!
-Melissa
By
TeachMeScience, at Wed Feb 08, 05:27:00 PM
You da man, Nick!
By
california_reality_check, at Wed Feb 08, 05:27:00 PM
congratulations, nick. must feel good.
By
Anonymous, at Wed Feb 08, 05:29:00 PM
Thank you Nick. NASA climate scientists know who the other "Georges" at NASA are. What would take to expose them? Hansen is to be applauded. He's been at this "political science" game for decades. There are many more NASA scientists, who are not as vocal or courageous as Hansen that have felt the scrutiny of this knowledge-fearing administration.
By
farside, at Wed Feb 08, 05:30:00 PM
Good work, well done, and thank you. You now have one more reader.
By
Anonymous, at Wed Feb 08, 05:30:00 PM
Hooray hooray hooray for Nick! You broke the story for the NYT; I'm glad they gave you credit, the swine. This is an accomplish to be proud of. As a mom--and one of my sons is a college journalist--I'm simply beaming.
By
Mrs. Tarquin Biscuitbarrel, at Wed Feb 08, 05:31:00 PM
Well done Nick!
You handsome clever guy you!
By
Anonymous, at Wed Feb 08, 05:35:00 PM
Way to go, Nick!
http://dimer.tamu.edu/simplog/archive.php?blogid=3&pid=3219
I'm adding you to my blogroll for Aggie Science blogs (blAgs).
By
Jim Hu, at Wed Feb 08, 05:36:00 PM
Fantastic reporting. If only the other news reporters had a tenth of your desire to find the truth and expose these phonies, our democracy would be safe. Unfortunately, that is not the case.
You left off a few names of plants, one being James Gannon, the gay prostitute/reporter. It just goes to show you that if things seem strange, examine them. While most plants are subtle, anything out of the ordinary should be investigated.
Great job again.
By
Anonymous, at Wed Feb 08, 05:41:00 PM
Nick, I hope you will give a close look at the political appointment of Shana Dale, a lawyer with a bachelor's degree in information systems, as NASA's Deputy Director. As the number two person at the helm for NASA I fear another Michael Brown FEMA fiasco if she really has to do much more than sit at her desk. She replaced a highly educted three time shuttle commander, hall of fame astronaut, decorated Air Force test pilot and Vietnam veteran. Fred Gregory is an astronaut's astronaut . . . he headed up the quality assurance program for NASA for several years and afer being promoted to Deputy Director, he basically ran the day to day operations of the agency, and served as interim director for a period of time. Take a look at Ms. Dale's biography
http://www.nasa.gov/about/highlights/dale_bio.html
and see if you find any qualifications at all for her very quiet appointment by Mr. Bush last November. Your last line, ". . .when the science suffers, we are all affected." prompted me to send this to you.
By
Anonymous, at Wed Feb 08, 05:42:00 PM
way to go nick!
By
Anonymous, at Wed Feb 08, 05:53:00 PM
I second the above comment regarding Shana Dale...
By
Anonymous, at Wed Feb 08, 05:56:00 PM
Hey Nick - sure you're getting swamped today! But great work - you may have heard about the petition to NASA going on right now -
http://www.environmental-action.org/gw.asp?id=1319&id4=
board
Hopefully, we'll turn NASA around!
Dan
By
Dan Stafford, at Wed Feb 08, 06:06:00 PM
Great work, Nick -- though as my advisor would say, "Shouldn't you be concentrating on your research?" Nevermind, stick with the blogging. You're an inspiration and a distraction, as I'm trying not to let my job of Communications Chair of Young Democrats of Atlanta do too much harm my PhD work at Georgia Tech. I'm adding you to my reading list and falling that much further behind schedule.
By
Shelby, at Wed Feb 08, 06:07:00 PM
Two points... Isn't there a disclaimer in the small print of a federal job application that says you swear you're telling the truth and it's punishable by fine or imprisonment? I hope someone can go through the list of Bush appointees and find out what other well-qualified individuals we taxpayers are paying.
By
BaKTHAFKUP, at Wed Feb 08, 06:08:00 PM
Bravo, Nick. V. impressed.
By
Johnny Sapphire, at Wed Feb 08, 06:18:00 PM
Here from Americablog...I always want to give kudos to work well done...it ain't scientific research which I'm sure you'd rather be doing, but GREAT JOB!! You are a credit to science and to blogging.
By
Lynne, at Wed Feb 08, 06:23:00 PM
Woo-hoo! From one Aggie to another, thanks and congratulations!
By
Anonymous, at Wed Feb 08, 06:26:00 PM
Great job!! Thank you for exposing the truth! We deserve it after all of the lies we get fed...
By
Cassandra, at Wed Feb 08, 06:28:00 PM
Thank you for exposing a truth instead of the "truthiness" we are used to. Maybe Deutsch (I pronounce it 'douche') is a gay prostitute like that guy from the press corps...lol!
By
Anonymous, at Wed Feb 08, 06:38:00 PM
Thanks for exposing that slimy thug. The GOP's war on science must end now.
By
magpie, at Wed Feb 08, 06:48:00 PM
Thanks for exposing yet another partisan hack and crony of the bush/cheney regime, merely designed to spread more disinformation to the public. Their clear agenda is to support the military/industrial complex in every way, by lying and cheating ordinary Americans while bankrupting America. This EVIL mis-administration should all be in prison for crimes against our great nation.
By
Anonymous, at Wed Feb 08, 06:49:00 PM
Nick, you rock!! I am so happy that you are paving ground for the "science activist", whatever that is defined as. Please keep in touch. I have so much to tell you about the LWI. Tomorrow I am sending a freshman to San Francisco for a convention where she will meet up with some members of the LWAC from Georgetown. Keep up the good work.
-Delorean St. Clair
By
Anonymous, at Wed Feb 08, 06:55:00 PM
Congrats on the scoop and all the press. Just remember I was the first to welcome you to the blogosphere. :D
By
Tara, at Wed Feb 08, 06:58:00 PM
Well done Nick! As you continue to point out, the bigger issue here is not that Deutsch wasn't qualified for the position to which he was appointed, it's that being a "Brownie" apparently exempts you from normal checks & balances. I imagine that the folks over at World O'Crap are kicking themselves for not picking up on the story before it ran in the Times. Props to John Lynch at Stranger Fruit for picking up on the story and helping to get the word out.
I'm still thinking about your central point that science is being co-opted by politics, and can't help but wonder, to paraphrase Hansen, how small a bit that Deutsch played in this. Certainly Deutsch is not the first Bush43 appointee to be revealed as underqualified...I keep seeing this scenario play out in my head [fictional] where Deutsch hands in a resume that says "Bachelor of Arts, Journalism, expected May 2003" and is counseled to removed the part about "expected".[/fictional] That just seems like an incredibly ballsy move for a person with so little power.
Keep up the good fight against all things "Sciency" (maybe Colbert will invite you on his show...)!
Peace!
JK
By
Anonymous, at Wed Feb 08, 07:05:00 PM
Cheers to you (event though you are an aggie (wink) that said, how's about NOW going after the nonsense called science supposedly being produced in DHHS, EPA, DofA, NIH, FDA, etc, etc.....
By
profk, at Wed Feb 08, 07:06:00 PM
Here from C&L, congratulations, that was excellent work. Hansen's issue-- what was this guy (and maybe other like him) doing in there? -- is what we need to investigate.
By
rrp, at Wed Feb 08, 07:07:00 PM
All RIGHT!! Good for you! Congratulations and thank you.
By
D.F. Facti, at Wed Feb 08, 07:11:00 PM
Good on ya!
By
Tlazolteotl, at Wed Feb 08, 07:16:00 PM
Wow, I wonder what all the "journalists" have been doing while
honest people like you do their work for them. Ignoring a war, and sucking up to rightwing psychopaths.. useless cretins.
GOOD WORK!!!
canukistani
By
Anonymous, at Wed Feb 08, 07:17:00 PM
http://www.oregonlive.com/search/index.ssf?/base/editorial/113935834197450.xml?oregonian?ede&coll=7
Editorial about the Bureau of Land Management cutting off funding for a study by a Oregon State University School of Forestry grad student. This study was published in Science in spite of a faculty effort to get the journal not to publish it.
Keep at it. We need the information.
By
caffeinemomma, at Wed Feb 08, 07:27:00 PM
Great work!!
Noted on dkos:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/2/8/14855/02267#9
By
Anonymous, at Wed Feb 08, 07:28:00 PM
WAY TO GO NICK! CITIZENS OF THE WORLD SAY 'THANKS'!
By
bonita sarita, at Wed Feb 08, 07:32:00 PM
Wasn't there also a problem with the guy whose job it was to investigate problmes at NASA too?
*shakes head sadly*
Good job. I just use my blog to mess around. Glad not everyone is doing so.
By
NYPinTA, at Wed Feb 08, 07:33:00 PM
Nick, you rock!
Lets undress the emperor even more.
By
Anonymous, at Wed Feb 08, 07:37:00 PM
Wow. Nick, you've turned out to be the most genius Aggie that Aggieland has birthed in quite some time (besides me, of course). Humongous kudos to you, my fellow 0-fiver. You got quite the jarring nod from the NYT.
Good luck in everything you do -- like you need it, though.
By
lunaliar, at Wed Feb 08, 07:38:00 PM